🔗 Share this article European Union Might Respond to ‘Unjustified’ US Travel Restrictions, Spokesperson Says The EU could “respond swiftly and decisively” against what it calls “unjustified” travel bans issued by the United States against five European individuals working on combating digital hatred and disinformation, a European Commission spokesperson has said. EU Officials Condemn US Action as ‘Intimidation’ European leaders such as Emmanuel Macron accused the US administration of “coercion and intimidation”, following the travel bans targeted figures that were at the heart of efforts to enact laws regulating American tech companies. “For too long, ideologues in Europe have spearheaded coordinated campaigns to pressure American platforms to suppress American viewpoints they disagree with,” stated the US secretary of state online. “The current administration will no longer tolerate these egregious acts of extraterritorial censorship.” Broad Criticism Across Europe Germany, Spain, the UK and a chorus of EU officials supported France in criticizing the move. The bans were imposed this week against a former EU commissioner involved in crafting the EU’s digital governance law, along with four activists fighting false information, from Germany and the United Kingdom. An Escalating Conflict Regarding Governance This European legislation is seen by Washington as a form of censorship, whereas European leaders contend the regulations are necessary to control hate speech and falsehoods. This row risks becoming a facet of a much broader existing political and ideological clash involving Washington and European institutions. Additional Updates Reported Today In related legal developments: A federal judge has halted efforts to cut federal homeland security funding to states which resist specific federal immigration rules. The official stated the action was “a further instance” of linking federal aid to adherence to directives. Approval was given for the dispatch of 350 national guard members to a major US city ahead of the holiday period, alongside an active border security initiative. A Pacific Island nation has agreed to take in dozens of individuals from the US in exchange for increased assistance, following signing a formal agreement with US authorities. Additionally, a Democratic lawmaker has filed a lawsuit seeking the stripping of the current president’s name from a prominent cultural institution in Washington DC. Experts have also noted that comments regarding foreign petroleum resources reflect a wider ideology in some quarters of “resource imperialism”, leading to parallels with historical international actions.
The EU could “respond swiftly and decisively” against what it calls “unjustified” travel bans issued by the United States against five European individuals working on combating digital hatred and disinformation, a European Commission spokesperson has said. EU Officials Condemn US Action as ‘Intimidation’ European leaders such as Emmanuel Macron accused the US administration of “coercion and intimidation”, following the travel bans targeted figures that were at the heart of efforts to enact laws regulating American tech companies. “For too long, ideologues in Europe have spearheaded coordinated campaigns to pressure American platforms to suppress American viewpoints they disagree with,” stated the US secretary of state online. “The current administration will no longer tolerate these egregious acts of extraterritorial censorship.” Broad Criticism Across Europe Germany, Spain, the UK and a chorus of EU officials supported France in criticizing the move. The bans were imposed this week against a former EU commissioner involved in crafting the EU’s digital governance law, along with four activists fighting false information, from Germany and the United Kingdom. An Escalating Conflict Regarding Governance This European legislation is seen by Washington as a form of censorship, whereas European leaders contend the regulations are necessary to control hate speech and falsehoods. This row risks becoming a facet of a much broader existing political and ideological clash involving Washington and European institutions. Additional Updates Reported Today In related legal developments: A federal judge has halted efforts to cut federal homeland security funding to states which resist specific federal immigration rules. The official stated the action was “a further instance” of linking federal aid to adherence to directives. Approval was given for the dispatch of 350 national guard members to a major US city ahead of the holiday period, alongside an active border security initiative. A Pacific Island nation has agreed to take in dozens of individuals from the US in exchange for increased assistance, following signing a formal agreement with US authorities. Additionally, a Democratic lawmaker has filed a lawsuit seeking the stripping of the current president’s name from a prominent cultural institution in Washington DC. Experts have also noted that comments regarding foreign petroleum resources reflect a wider ideology in some quarters of “resource imperialism”, leading to parallels with historical international actions.